The paradigm of networked crisis management: A strategic re-alignment of the public health service for civil security scenarios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52905/hbph2026.127Keywords:
networked crisis management, systemic resilience, public health service, hybrid threats, civil-military cooperationAbstract
Crisis management in the Public Health Service (PHS) require a paradigm shift, transitioning from a reactive medical provider to a central strategic pillar of national security. Addressing 21st-century hybrid threats — such as cyber-attacks, disinformation and sabotage – the "Frankfurt Model" offers a blueprint for systemic resilience. The framework moves beyond linear logistics toward a networked, "whole-of-society" approach. Key components include scenario-agnostic business continuity planning, information sovereignty via offline redundancy and a four-level escalation framework. We conclude with five strategic imperatives: legislating multi-agency crisis frameworks, embedding redundancy into critical infrastructure, formalizing a permanent civil-military health command, developing secure interoperable communication platform and initiating national societal resilience programs. Ultimately, we argue that health and security are interdependent, requiring PHS to assume a proactive, formative role in maintaining societal stability during protracted crises.
References
Hafering, S. (2024). Grünes Licht für das neue Krisenabwehr- und Trainingszentrum – Stärkung des Krisenmanagements der Stadt Frankfurt. Available online at https://feuer-haus.de/2024/10/17/gruenes-licht-fuer-das-neue-krisenabwehr-und-trainingszentrum-staerkung-des-krisenmanagements-der-stadt-frankfurt/ (accessed 2/24/2026).
Heßberger, K. (2024). Stärkung des Krisenmanagements der Stadt Frankfurt. Available online at https://www.rheinmainverlag.de/2024/10/16/staerkung-des-krisenmanagements-der-stadt-frankfurt/ (accessed 2/24/2026).
Miller, B. H./Miller, B. (2015). From WMD to WME: An Ever-Expanding Threat Spectrum. Journal of Strategic Security 8 (3 (Suppl)), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.8.3S.1480.
Prasad, N./Diro, A./Warren, M./Fernando, M. (2025). A survey of cyber threat attribution: Challenges, techniques, and future directions. Computers & Security 157, 104606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2025.104606.
Tinnemann, P. (2025). Der Öffentliche Gesundheitsdienst in Zeiten von Polykrisen. Hessisches Ärzteblatt of 2025. Available online at https://www.laekh.de/heftarchiv/ausgabe/artikel/2025/februar-2025/der-oeffentliche-gesundheitsdienst-in-zeiten-von-polykrisen (accessed 2/24/2026).
Tinnemann, P./Naujoks, F./Wiggerich, E. (2024). Crisis Management in Frankfurt aM: A Collaborative Approach Using United Nations Guidance for Cross-Authority Risk Assessment and Strategy Development. In: P. Tinnemann/F. Naujoks/E. Wiggerich (Eds.). Crisis Management in Frankfurt aM: A Collaborative Approach Using United Nations Guidance for Cross-Authority Risk Assessment and Strategy Development, Der Öffentliche Gesundheitsdienst – Rückenwind für Gesundheit! 73. Wissenschaftlicher Kongress | BVÖGD e.V., BZÖG e.V., DGÖG e.V, Hamburg, 24.04.2024 - 27.04.2024. Georg Thieme Verlag.
Tinnemann, P./Pullmann, N./Westphal, T./Helm, E./Höglund-Braun, H./von Wagner, M. (2025). Auswirkungen der Änderungen in der Global Sicherheitsarchitektur und mögliche Verantwortlichkeiten der Gesundheitsämter. Crisis Prevention (3).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Frank Naujoks

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.